I have always enjoyed Sylva Ifedigbo’s column on Daily
Times, but his recent column made me think of reconsidering my likeness for his column. I found
his arguments quite questionable. He made reference to Ian
Birrells’ article (which I think was the premise on which he based his line of reasoning)
in Guardian, UK. In my opinion as a trained development economist I found most
of the things said by Ian and Sylva as misplaced and full of blunders. Majority
of economists don’t like speaking in normative terms because such perspective
often times conceals the realities in the real world. Focusing on Sylva’s
column, he painted a nice picture of growth in African countries (making specific
reference to Nigeria) with figures in percentages, which would make any reader
who doesn’t think in real terms believe him. What I find funny when people like
him give those percentage figures is that they fail to tell their audience how those
figures have translated into changing people’s living standard, like how many
people those figures have moved out of poverty; how those figures have given
access to basic human necessities such as food, shelter, health care, security
of life and so on; how many infrastructural development that have taken place
as a result of those figures. He alluded to some figures from AFDB but failed
to recognize the fact (which is the most important part of argument on growth) that
those figures are arrant nonsense when growth is not inclusive. It is totally ridiculous
to bask in euphoria of rhetoric given by pundits that Africa’s economic
growth has been growing remarkably when the link between Africa’s growth
performance and poverty reduction is weak and porous. It is even shameful to be
excited that Nigeria’s economic growth (which is often doctored to present a
good image of the economy) has been steadily at 7.5% even when over 70% of our
national population wallow in abject poverty and our dear country contribute over
5% to global hunger. However, painting a general picture that success story of commendable
growth performance spreads across African countries is highly misplaced and
flawed. In as much as I reckon that some countries like South Africa and Botswana
for example have made remarkable progress given their ability to put into resourceful
use their domestic resources and maintain robust macroeconomic framework, I wouldn’t
say the same for countries (like Nigeria) that have failed woefully despite
their abundant natural resources.
Frankly speaking, we should be wary of these
writers who preach good messages about Africa with little concern about the serious
challenges we face in Africa. They turn deaf ears to serious problems that
threaten our progress towards development in pretense that they are highly
patriotic. I find quite absurd that these writers de-emphasize the need for
African countries to form a competitive and robust alliance so we can break away
from undue exploitation we face from the west and end repatriation of our
resources to the other side. When I read statements such as “like every other society, we have evolved, overcoming
our many challenges and rewriting our history. The result and the reality of
our time are that quietly, a new Africa has emerged powered by capitalism,
embracing democracy and tearing down stereotypes” I became worried about the
kind of message this guy is forcing us to imbibe. Anyone who knows exactly the
realities we face in Africa today wouldn’t hesitate to perceive such statements
as wonky and cobblers. Such statements hid under the disguise that we are on the
brink of massive economic progress when in essence we are far away from the
truth; such statements uphold the ideals of capitalism (a scenario where 99% of
the population struggle at the bottom and 1% live grandiosely and glamorously
at the top) and are ideal formula for fattening the pockets of capitalists;
such statements, though seem quite appealing, may be hard to justify given the
current situations we have in Africa. For example the war ravaged zones like Congo
DR, Sudan, Mali, etc, followed by religious intolerant and violent Nigeria,
Egypt, etc, backed by uprising in Rwanda, Somalia, Uganda, and persecution of
LGBT’s in Uganda, Nigeria, etc. National security in these countries are threatened
and security agents are unfocused with such emergence, and this feeds into the
proliferation of militia, banditry and general bedlam blowing like a breeze
around African region, leading to the highest levels of internally displaced
people ever in history. These evidence are enough to invalidate his line of
reasoning.
We are often times captivated by stories that tell us how
beautiful and lovely Africa looks; enthralled by articles that remind us of how
naturally endowed our dear continent is; and fascinated by rhetoric that always
paint good image of our polity and economy, that we always ignore real issues
and fail to take serious efforts to solve our problems. This is part of the
story that makes a big difference between Africa and other regions like Asia
and Latin America and Caribbean. In Africa we dwell so much on the resources we
are endowed with that we fail to get control of these resources and put them
into productive use that benefits everybody. I’m not any way cynical about our
potentials as a continent endowed with good qualities one can hardly find
elsewhere on earth, but I’m underscoring the point that the time has come when
we stop being unnecessarily mawkish about how we are perceived by the west. We have
serious challenges we face in Africa and the progress we make in overcoming
these challenges does not in any way depend on how we are perceived by the west
or how the western media report us. Over the past decades we have faced the
same challenges as regions like Asia, but now we are nothing closer to them in
terms of development. If the truth must be told, the argument that our progresses
in Africa are misrepresented by the west is misguided, and I find it hard to accept
such flimsy excuse. Not in this 21st century. Our concern should be
to make progress and gauge our progress by how we perceive our progress within
ourselves and not how the west identify us.
No matter how we try to hide the truth it will always
stare us in the face. I found arguments in his column too generalized more than
I would appreciate. Arguments there-in are
indeed colour blind and as such are dead duck. In as much as I would love to
portray the great potentials and good qualities that abound in Africa I wouldn’t
do that when these potentials and good qualities have been bungled by few set
of inconsiderate people in the sit of leadership who always want us to say that
everything is alright even when we are slapped severally in the face by their adverse
policies. They want Africa’s image to be painted as angelic because that creates
a better chance for aids/grants, especially now that donors lay more emphasis
on economic progress before aids can be granted. I would rather devout more
energy into exposing poverty and hunger; religious intolerance; persecution of
people because of their sexual orientation; and all that is alien to human
existence because I do not want to live in Africa where everything goes wrong
and we pretend everything is alright; I do not want to live in Africa where 1%
lives comfortably at the top and 99% others struggle at the bottom; I do not
want to live in Africa where we praise 7.5% of growth in GDP while over 70% of
our national population live in abject poverty; I do not want to spread a
message about beautiful and lovely Africa looks when one in eight children die
before the age of five; I won’t spread the message that Africa is on the brink
of breakthrough when millions of Africans go to bed every night with hunger; I would
rather speak of problems and challenges that have kept us moribund for decades
rather than bask in euphoria of natural endowments.
No comments:
Post a Comment